Disclaimer: The aim of this article is information and enlightenment; please consult a solicitor for individual professional advice.
MUSIC FOR YOUR MOVIE: DOs and DON’Ts
Picture this. You are watching a Yoruba ‘epic’ movie. It’s an ancient war scene set in a local village in Ondo State of Nigeria, and suddenly, the voice of Celine Dion breaks out “Gonna stand by your side noooooow, let me kiss all your tears away…”
No, your sister didn’t just put her phone’s music player on the loudspeaker mode. It’s the part of soundtrack of the Yoruba epic movie you are watching. Yeah, yeah, I know it’s not that bad anymore, but I had to get your attention somehow.
Dear people of Nollywood, we are talking movies + music today. Never underestimate the role of a soundtrack in a movie. In fact, in Hollywood and Bollywood, it is not unusual for a movie to have its own soundtrack album, released separately from the movie.
Let’s understand how to properly acquire music for your movie.
At the onset, let’s distinguish between the music on the soundtrack of a movie that has already been produced and the music that is not yet on the soundtrack of a movie. Both are musical pieces that are protected under the Copyright Act. However, they are protected differently. The music on the soundtrack of a movie is protected as part of a cinematograph film, as it is included in its definition in section 39 (1). The music that is yet to be on a movie soundtrack, however, is protected as a musical work. It is this musical work that is sought to be used that we are concerned with here.
To obtain music for your movie, you have two options:
1. Use already existing music that has been sung and recorded.
2. Create fresh and completely original music for your movie.
Or you can take both options.
Existing Music
If you’re using existing music, bear in mind that the musical piece is a protected work under the Act. Section 5 (1) (a) grants the holder of the copyright of a musical work a number of exclusive rights in the work which includes reproduction, publishing, performance, distribution, broadcasting, adaptation, making of a cinematograph film or record in respect of the work, or doing all of the foregoing in relation to the translation or adaptation of the work.
It may be quite tricky to ascertain who owns the copyright in a song. It may have been written and composed by Mr. Lagbaja and recorded by Mrs. Tamedun of One-Nigeria Record Company. If you want to use the lyrics and composition of the song and get your own sister, Nightingale, to sing it, you’ll need to ask Mr. Lagbaja for a license. This license is called a synchronisation license (synch license).
If, however, you want to use the song as sung and recorded by Mrs. Tamedun, you’ll need to get a master use license from One-Nigeria Record Company to use this specific recording, in addition to getting a synch license from Mr. Lagbaja. In Nigeria, however, all this grammar may not be necessary as it is usually the same person that writes a song and records it.
It’s prudent to make certain that neither Mr. Lagbaja nor Mrs. Tamedun has infringed the copyright of another person entirely (a third party) in writing or recording the song, so you’ll not get ‘implicated’.
Whichever license you get, whether it’s a synch license, a master use license, or both, ensure that it gives not just the right to reproduce and use the musical work on your movie but also includes further rights of publishing, performance, distribution, broadcasting, etc. It may also be clever to envisage the possibility of developing a soundtrack album in the future.
Original Music
You may decide to go the route of producing your own fresh music for the movie. This is especially preferable if you are working with a low budget. You could get a good songwriter to write the song, and beg your choir leader to sing it for you. It’s also possible for you to get a song that is already in the public domain (i.e. a song for which the copyright protection has expired), this means no licenses, no royalties.
It’s generally cheaper to get an unpopular singer to record the song for you. However, if you must use a popular musician, you should ensure that he/she is not under an exclusive recording contract with a record company, or else the record company’s permission will be required.
It’s advisable to insist on a contract between you and the person who is writing/singing/recording the music for you which names you as the owner of the copyright in the music. This is because under section 9 of the Copyright Act, this writer and/or singer would be the owner of the musical lyrics and composition or recording, unless such a contract exists. Ensure that it is a work for hire under the contract, that way, the copyright belongs to you.
Any option you choose, don’t forget that you have to do this for every musical work you use.
Tiresome, isn’t it? Getting an entertainment lawyer isn’t such a bad idea, after all.
Showing posts with label movie. Show all posts
Showing posts with label movie. Show all posts
Thursday, July 29, 2010
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Feather Play
Disclaimer: The aim of this article is information and enlightenment; please consult a solicitor for individual professional advice.
FEATHER PLAY
The hard way is the most effective way of learning. However, since I’m nice, I’ll be gentle, but we do have to learn. Let us ruffle some feathers, so we can learn, of course. For the purposes of this bird play, we’ll take a journey on one of those ‘executive’ coaches that ferry people across the country and sometimes outside.
Ever travelled long distance by road in Nigeria in one of those ‘executive’ coaches? There are a lot of reasons not to: the fatigue, the time, the crappy food…but on the good side there’s the extra leg room, added convenience, the movies…. Let’s talk about those movies you watch on the road (or maybe in the air). Now, we won’t be discussing the sensibility of the storyline or the appropriateness of the cast, we will be discussing legality.
Of course, for the purposes of this discussion, we’ll be referring to our beloved Copyright Act. Movies are protected under the Act as cinematograph films. This right is vested in the author of the film, maybe the producer. However, it is possible that a film being viewed in a coach has been licensed to a Pay TV broadcaster, like DSTV or hiTV, and it is from this broadcasting station that the film is copied and shown in buses.
To determine whose copyright has been infringed, it would depend on whether the film is being shown straight from the disc on which it was recorded by the producer, or whether it is being shown from the channel of a broadcast station, where it was part of a broadcast (we are assuming that the broadcast itself is duly licensed). Either way, there is some protection.
By section 5 (1) (c) of the Act, the author of a cinematograph film generally has the exclusive right to control, i.e. to do or authorise the doing of any of the following acts in Nigeria:
a) Make a copy of the film;
b) Cause the film to be seen or heard in public;
c) Make any record embodying the recording in any part of the soundtrack associated with the film by utilising such soundtrack;
d) Distribute to the public, for commercial purposes of the work, by way of rental, lease, hire, loan or similar arrangement.
Similarly, thanks to section 7 of the Act, the copyright in a broadcast is the exclusive right to control the doing in Nigeria of any of the following acts:
a) the recording and re-broadcast of the whole or a substantial part of the broadcast;
b) the communication to the public of the whole or a substantial part of a television broadcast, either in its original form or in any form recognisably derived from the original;
c) the distribution to the public for the commercial purposes, of copies of the work, by way of rental, lease, hire, loan or similar arrangement;
d) the taking of still photographs from the broadcast.
Now are these ‘coaches’ encroaching on some rights? Let’s look at section 14(1) (a) and (c). The import of this section is that It provides that copyright is infringed by any person who without the licence or authorisation of the owner of the copyright:
(a) does, or cause any other person to do an act, the doing of which is controlled by copyright;
(c) exhibits in public any article in respect of which copyright is infringed under paragraph (a) of this subsection.
So, now, you tell me, if these coaches have not been authorised to show these films, will they be infringing some person’s right, prima facie? It’s okay, you won’t be an ‘aiding’ or ‘abetting’ by watching the movies in the coach, so you can tell the truth, at least to yourself. The coach company has probably lost their own copy of your ticket anyway, so no one will be able to trace you.
It would be interesting if the actual copyright owners were to take it up with these guys, but that is not the point here. The issue is that those things that you thought you could do and get away with? Well, people are starting to take notice. For every ‘home video’ you buy, realise it is just what you call it, a home video, not meant for public use or viewing. I believe a warning usually appears on the screen to tell you just that. The fact that the warning is tacky and/or may be filled with typographical errors would not relieve you of liability.
Oh, you are smiling? Afterall, you do not own an executive coach. However, as it happens, this is not limited to buses, planes, bicycles, scooters or anything moves you from point A to B. It applies in a lot of situations: the club or that is busy showing broadcasts from Soundcity and MTV Base; the owner of a restaurant or fast food place that is playing ‘home videos’ or watching Africa Magic during business hours where customers can watch; the ‘beer parlour’ owner who hopes to draw in more customers by showing football matches on TV…
The copyright to these works are owned by people who are slowly but surely getting interested in their investments, and whether you like it or not, the law says they get to dictate how their works are exploited. So, if hiTV says to pay 50,000 for some form of commercial bouquet before you can show their matches or whatever in public, well, tough luck.
You can either get an authorisation from the owner, or you can wait for fifty years after the end of the year in which the film was first published or the broadcast first took place, whatever the case may be, since that is when the protection ends. I personally think it might make more sense to go the first way, though, because if you have to wait for fifty years, instead of the ‘home video’ they expect, your clientele may mistake it for some form of documentary on 'Yesteryears'.
If you must do it, do it right. Really, how hard is that to understand?
FEATHER PLAY
The hard way is the most effective way of learning. However, since I’m nice, I’ll be gentle, but we do have to learn. Let us ruffle some feathers, so we can learn, of course. For the purposes of this bird play, we’ll take a journey on one of those ‘executive’ coaches that ferry people across the country and sometimes outside.
Ever travelled long distance by road in Nigeria in one of those ‘executive’ coaches? There are a lot of reasons not to: the fatigue, the time, the crappy food…but on the good side there’s the extra leg room, added convenience, the movies…. Let’s talk about those movies you watch on the road (or maybe in the air). Now, we won’t be discussing the sensibility of the storyline or the appropriateness of the cast, we will be discussing legality.
Of course, for the purposes of this discussion, we’ll be referring to our beloved Copyright Act. Movies are protected under the Act as cinematograph films. This right is vested in the author of the film, maybe the producer. However, it is possible that a film being viewed in a coach has been licensed to a Pay TV broadcaster, like DSTV or hiTV, and it is from this broadcasting station that the film is copied and shown in buses.
To determine whose copyright has been infringed, it would depend on whether the film is being shown straight from the disc on which it was recorded by the producer, or whether it is being shown from the channel of a broadcast station, where it was part of a broadcast (we are assuming that the broadcast itself is duly licensed). Either way, there is some protection.
By section 5 (1) (c) of the Act, the author of a cinematograph film generally has the exclusive right to control, i.e. to do or authorise the doing of any of the following acts in Nigeria:
a) Make a copy of the film;
b) Cause the film to be seen or heard in public;
c) Make any record embodying the recording in any part of the soundtrack associated with the film by utilising such soundtrack;
d) Distribute to the public, for commercial purposes of the work, by way of rental, lease, hire, loan or similar arrangement.
Similarly, thanks to section 7 of the Act, the copyright in a broadcast is the exclusive right to control the doing in Nigeria of any of the following acts:
a) the recording and re-broadcast of the whole or a substantial part of the broadcast;
b) the communication to the public of the whole or a substantial part of a television broadcast, either in its original form or in any form recognisably derived from the original;
c) the distribution to the public for the commercial purposes, of copies of the work, by way of rental, lease, hire, loan or similar arrangement;
d) the taking of still photographs from the broadcast.
Now are these ‘coaches’ encroaching on some rights? Let’s look at section 14(1) (a) and (c). The import of this section is that It provides that copyright is infringed by any person who without the licence or authorisation of the owner of the copyright:
(a) does, or cause any other person to do an act, the doing of which is controlled by copyright;
(c) exhibits in public any article in respect of which copyright is infringed under paragraph (a) of this subsection.
So, now, you tell me, if these coaches have not been authorised to show these films, will they be infringing some person’s right, prima facie? It’s okay, you won’t be an ‘aiding’ or ‘abetting’ by watching the movies in the coach, so you can tell the truth, at least to yourself. The coach company has probably lost their own copy of your ticket anyway, so no one will be able to trace you.
It would be interesting if the actual copyright owners were to take it up with these guys, but that is not the point here. The issue is that those things that you thought you could do and get away with? Well, people are starting to take notice. For every ‘home video’ you buy, realise it is just what you call it, a home video, not meant for public use or viewing. I believe a warning usually appears on the screen to tell you just that. The fact that the warning is tacky and/or may be filled with typographical errors would not relieve you of liability.
Oh, you are smiling? Afterall, you do not own an executive coach. However, as it happens, this is not limited to buses, planes, bicycles, scooters or anything moves you from point A to B. It applies in a lot of situations: the club or that is busy showing broadcasts from Soundcity and MTV Base; the owner of a restaurant or fast food place that is playing ‘home videos’ or watching Africa Magic during business hours where customers can watch; the ‘beer parlour’ owner who hopes to draw in more customers by showing football matches on TV…
The copyright to these works are owned by people who are slowly but surely getting interested in their investments, and whether you like it or not, the law says they get to dictate how their works are exploited. So, if hiTV says to pay 50,000 for some form of commercial bouquet before you can show their matches or whatever in public, well, tough luck.
You can either get an authorisation from the owner, or you can wait for fifty years after the end of the year in which the film was first published or the broadcast first took place, whatever the case may be, since that is when the protection ends. I personally think it might make more sense to go the first way, though, because if you have to wait for fifty years, instead of the ‘home video’ they expect, your clientele may mistake it for some form of documentary on 'Yesteryears'.
If you must do it, do it right. Really, how hard is that to understand?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)